|
INVOS Frequently Asked Questions
What is the INVOS?
The INVOS® Cerebral
Oximeter is a trend monitor of brain hemodynamics. It is a device
which uses near-infrared spectroscopy to measure changes in the
balance between oxygen supply and demand, predominately in the brain.
What does INVOS mean?
In-Vivo Optical Spectroscopy.
How does it work?
The INVOS Cerebral Oximeter passes harmless,
low-intensity near-infrared light into the patient's forehead where
it penetrates the skull and passes through the cerebral cortex.
By measuring the returned light at two distances from the light
source (3 and 4 cm), the spectral absorption of blood in the brain
can be determined.
How many wavelengths are used?
The INVOS Cerebral Oximeter generates
two wavelengths of light (730 and 805 nm) using two LEDs (light-emitting
diodes) which are alternately illuminated.
How deep in the brain does the measurement
reach?
Because of the characteristics of extracranial
tissue and skull, light which is detected at least 2.5 cm from the
light source has penetrated to the dura mater and cerebrospinal
fluid (CSF).1,
2
At 3 and 4 cm, the detected light absorption originates primarily
in the gray matter blood with some white matter blood. Of course,
this is variable across individuals.
How does the light get through the skull?
In the near-infrared band, light scatters
easily through mammalian tissues. Even visible light diffuses through
bone which is somewhat translucent due to lower blood volumes.
Where do I place the SomaSensor®?
Can I place it over hair or on other areas of the head?
The SomaSensor is designed to be placed
in the front-temporal region only (forehead, either right or left
of midline). Placement over scalp, even when shaved, will result
in very low return signals due to absorption of light by hair follicles.
Can I reuse the sensors if I'm careful?
When the sensor has been removed from
the patient, it has a layer of dead skin cells on the adhesive.
This interferes with the adhesive's optical properties and adhesion,
resulting in signals which may reflect a normal baseline but will
not respond to changes in rSO2 accurately.
Why is the Cerebral Oximeter a bilateral
device?
Many times a patient may exhibit unequal
perfusion patterns bilaterally, especially patients with atherosclerotic
vascular disease or elderly patients. Bilateral monitoring can help
distinguish between unilateral oxygen imbalances, i.e. focal ischemia,
blood steal, versus those caused by systemic pathologies.
What is the rSO2
index?
The rSO2 index
is a measure of the oxygen saturation of the mixed arterial and
venous blood in the brain cortex. Since the volume of blood is predominately
venous, it reflects the balance between oxygen supply and demand
in the brain. It is referred to as an index because it is not easily
validated in vivo, is regional in nature and may not reflect events
occurring at a distance from the sensor.
What is the update rate for the displayed
rSO2?
A new rSO2 value
is displayed on the screen approximately every four seconds. Each
four-second sample represents the most recent data (there is no
averaging with previous samples).
How
accurate is the INVOS?
Comparison with blood samples was evaluated
in a recent volunteer hypoxia study where 42 healthy subjects were
measured at five levels of oxygenation, which were then repeated
at a higher cerebral blood flow.3
INVOS readings were compared to blood sample
co-oximeter analysis of jugular venous saturation and arterial saturation
combined in a 3:1 ratio. Over a range of 45% to 85%, trend accuracy
was ±2.9% and absolute accuracy was ±5%, both one standard deviation.
How
accurate is the pediatric sensor?
A study of 22 congenital heart malformation
patients in the pediatric Cardiac Cath Lab compared oximetry data
with blood sample co-oximeter analysis of jugular venous saturation
and arterial saturation combined in a 3:1 ratio. Over a range of
50% to 95%, trend accuracy was ±1.6% and absolute accuracy was ±4.7%,
both one standard deviation.
Where does the 3:1 venous to arterial
compartment partitioning come from?
Like other tissue, the cerebral vasculature
has been previously described as having a greater volume of venous
blood than arterial blood. Recent research suggests that between
60% to 100% of cerebral blood is venous by volume.4
Although this volume cannot be validated in vivo, INVOS values correlate
well when a 75% venous volume5
is assumed during volume changes which occur as a result of changes
in PaCO2.3
How does an arterial-venous compartment
shift affect the accuracy of the measurement?
First, the 75/25 ratio is only a rough
average of what we believe the mean ratio in most healthy individuals
to be. Second, when compartment ratios change without a change in
blood volume, the accuracy of the oximeter does not change at all.
What changes is the comparison between the rSO2
index and a known measurable parameter such as jugular venous oxygen
saturation (SjvO2). This change does not
affect clinical utility however since the rSO2
index still represents oxygen availability in the brain. Third,
INVOS responses to known compartmental shifts are very small. Consider
the response during retrograde cerebral perfusion (RCP).
Describe
the INVOS Cerebral Oximeter's response to retrograde cerebral perfusion
(RCP).
During RCP, highly oxygenated blood is
pumped into the cerebral venous system and flows retrograde into
the arterial system, providing oxygen to the brain as it passes
through. When RCP is initiated, there is an instantaneous shift
from predominantly venous to predominantly arterial blood in the
brain as the two compartments are swapped. This change, however,
does not cause the expected spike in rSO2
index but is represented by a more gradual change in saturation
which can increase as a result of the incoming oxygen or decrease
slowly, as shown in the graph, during low flow.
How do changes in blood volume affect
the accuracy?
With regard to changing blood volumes,
the volunteer hypoxia validation study3
examined accuracy at normo- and hypercapnia. A mean decrease of
5 mmHg in etCO2, which would cause about
a 5% decrease in blood volume in the cortex,6
causes a small increase in the slope of the fSO2-rSO2
regression, increasing the sensitivity of the INVOS Cerebral Oximeter
to brain oxygenation changes. This is consistent with the change
in light absorption, which decreases when hemoglobin decreases,
resulting in an increase in the depth of penetration of light. This
change is small: theoretically, a 20% change in blood volume will
cause a 10% saturation change in the patient to be in error by 0.8.
The rSO2 reading would reflect either
+9.2 for increased hemoglobin volumes or would overestimate decreases
reading -10.8, erring on the positive side.3
Does temperature affect the accuracy
of the readings?
No. The SomaSensor is designed to measure
temperature changes and compensate for intensity changes as a function
of temperature. However, the rSO2 reading
is not corrected for right-left shifts in the oxyhemoglobin dissociation
curve and the data must be interpreted according to the patient's
temperature and blood pH, also like a co-oximeter or pulse oximeter.
How does extracranial blood affect the
measurement?
Extracranial blood has a very small effect
on rSO2, except in cases where the extracranial
blood volume is artificially increased, such as with a head tourniquet
or hematoma. Several studies of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) where
the external carotid artery was clamped separately to assess the
effects of scalp ischemia on rSO2 have
shown its effect to be quite small, assuming the external carotid
is not perfusing brain tissue.7,8
Another study showed a significant correlation between rSO2
and SjvO2 during CEA but no correlation
between rSO2 and the oxygen saturation
of blood in the facial vein during clamping, despite the fact that
changes were more pronounced in the facial vein than in the jugular.9
Another CEA study showed that the use of dual detectors by the INVOS
Cerebral Oximeter resulted in a 4 times reduction in the effect
of extracranial blood than a similar device with only one detector.10
How much of a change is significant?
What is the threshold of concern?
In every controlled study of carotid endarterectomy
to date, changes in the rSO2 index of
12-20 points (absolute) or 20%-30% (relative) correlated with changes
in the patient's neurological status.11-14
In these studies, as well as in a large study of cardiac surgery
patients, values of rSO2 index less than
50 were associated with higher probabilities of a poor outcome.
Why do some patients with low values
show no pathology?
The threshold of concern for rSO2
values represents an average value where most subjects will eventually
experience problems, similar to thresholds of blood gases or blood
pressure. However, there are individuals who can tolerate lower
values or longer durations, seemingly without pathology. Actually,
patients can experience a frontal lobe injury which is not immediately
apparent (frontal lobe injury affects executive function and is
generally non-eloquent). Typically, patients with pre-existing pathologies
are less tolerant of low rSO2 values and
end up doing worse following a desaturation.
Can the INVOS Cerebral Oximeter measure
cerebral blood flow (CBF)?
No. The INVOS readings may not even correlate
with changes in CBF unless there is an ischemic episode. In a healthy
individual, CBF can change continually in response to changes in
blood pressure, carbon dioxide and metabolic rate, while rSO2
index will likely remain relatively constant. The INVOS Cerebral
Oximeter is designed to measure changes in brain blood oxygen saturation
and can provide an early warning of cerebral hypoperfusion.12
Can the INVOS Cerebral Oximeter measure
cytochrome oxidase?
No. Cytochrome is an oxygen-dependent
chromophore found in the mitochondria of brain cells in quantities
typically 10 times less than hemoglobin. Because it represents oxygenation
at the cellular level, it provides information on tissue oxygen
uptake. In addition to low volumes, the absorption spectra of cytochrome
varies over a range which is 10 times smaller than hemoglobin, making
the optical signal two orders of magnitude (100 times) less than
the hemoglobin signal. Cytochrome monitoring is virtually impossible
to validate using other monitors and it is not a familiar parameter
with most clinicians. For these reasons, the INVOS Cerebral Oximeter
was not designed to measure cytochrome oxidase.
Does the INVOS Cerebral Oximeter measure
tissue oxygen uptake?
No, it measures blood oxygen saturation
of hemoglobin in a region of the brain. If the oxygen affinity of
hemoglobin is left-shifted (higher affinity) and off-loading of
oxygen to tissue is impaired, the INVOS values may not reflect this
and may show high or normal values during these periods as does
a pulse oximeter. This condition may occur during cardiac surgery
where the patient is hypothermic and frequently acidotic. However,
numerous studies in cardiac surgery have shown that hypoperfusion
is much more common and that simple interventions aimed at increasing
perfusion and/or oxygenation can improve patient outcomes and reduce
costs.14-17
What happens when I place the sensor
on a brain-dead patient?
Following herniation of the brain, normal
to slightly elevated rSO2 values can be
expected. This is also the case when the sensor is placed over a
previously infarcted area of brain tissue in a stroke victim.18
This is assumed to be caused by normal oxygen diffusion through
tissues in the absence of blood flow or drainage of scalp blood
into the cranial vault through the diploic veins. If oxygen consumption
is non-existent, a normal to moderately high rSO2
value can be expected. On the other hand, the penumbra area around
an infarct can be expected to be low in the absence of therapeutic
interventions.18 In
cases where the sensor is placed on cadavers and near normal readings
are obtained, the expected cerebral venous saturation after death
can range from 0% to 95% and is dependent on the conditions of storage,
not the cause of death.19
Why does the sensor sometimes give a
reading when it is not on the patient?
Like a television remote control, the
sensor can bounce near-infrared light off the wall or ceiling of
a room. When room light is normal, the INVOS Cerebral Oximeter is
designed to detect the room light and reject these signals from
the sensor. In a darkened room, however, the ambient light may not
be bright enough to trigger rejection and this may produce readings
typically around 70. This can also occur when the sensor is adhered
to certain types of tabletop such as laminated plastic, which mimics
a critical optical property of human tissue. However, when the sensor
is properly adhered to the patient, it will reject signals which
do not represent brain tissue as described by Sehic et al. in their
case report of a patient with a frontal skull defect.20
What are the sensitivity and specificity
of the INVOS Cerebral Oximeter?
Since cerebral oximetry is a relatively
new monitoring modality, data is limited as to its sensitivity and
specificity in detecting true cerebral hypoxia. While cerebral oximetry
has the potential to identify global events such as hypoperfusion,
hypoxia or anemia, its regional nature limits its ability to detect
focal events distant from the sensor. In a 99-patient study of the
first-generation INVOS 3100, the sensitivity and specificity in
detecting changes in neurologic status during awake carotid endarterectomy
were 80.0% and 82.2% respectively.12
Negative predictive value (NPV), the ability of the monitor to indicate
that everything is OK, was very high, 97.4%. In another awake 50-patient
study,11 a -25% relative
change from baseline was 100% sensitive and specific while a 54-patient
study21 comparing the
INVOS 3100A to EEG changes found a sensitivity of 94.0% and specificity
of 82.0%.
How can I retrieve data using the INVOS
Cerebral Oximeter?
The INVOS 4100 and 5100 have four methods
to retrieve and archive rSO2 data: an
analog output for use with a data collection or recording system,
an RS-232 output suitable for communications with any Windows-based
PC, an optional 3.5" floppy disk drive or an optional printer.
References:
| 1. |
Okada E, Firbank
M, Schweiger M, Arridge SR, Cope M, Delpy DT: Theoretical and
experimental investigation of near-infrared light propagation
in a model of the adult head. Appl Optics 36(1):21-31, 1997. |
| 2. |
Hongo K, Kobayashi
S, Okudera H, Hokama M, Nakagawa F: Noninvasive cerebral optical
spectroscopy for monitoring cerebral hemodynamics - basic study
using indocyanine green. Neurol Res 17:89-93, 1995. |
| 3. |
Kim M, Ward D, Cartwright
C, Kolano J, Chlebowski S, Henson L: Estimation of jugular venous
O2 saturation from cerebral oximetry or arterial O2 saturation
during isocapnic hypoxia. J Clin Monit 2001;16:191-99. |
| 4. |
Watzman HM, Kurth
CD, Montenegro LM, Rome J, Steven JM, Nicolson SC: Arterial
and venous contributions to near-infrared cerebral oximetry.
Anesthesiology 2000;93:947-53. |
| 5. |
Mchedlishvilli GI: Arterial
Behavior and Blood Circulation in the Brain. New York, Plenum
Press; 1986, pp 56-57. |
| 6. |
Greenburg JH, Alavi
A, Reivich M, Kuhl D, Uzzell B: Local cerebral blood volume
response to carbon dioxide in man. Circ Res 43:324-31, 1978. |
| 7. |
Duncan LA, Ruckley
CV, Wildsmith JA: Cerebral oximetry: a useful monitor during
carotid artery surgery. Anaesthesia 50(12):1041-45, 1995. |
| 8. |
Samra SK, Stanley
JC, Zelenock GB, Dorje P: An assessment of contributions made
by extracranial tissues during cerebral oximetry. J Neurosurg
Anest 11(1):1-5, 1999. |
| 9. |
Grubhofer G, Lassnigg
A, Manlik F, Marx E, Trubel W, Hiesmayr M: The contribution
of extracranial blood oxygenation on near-infrared spectroscopy
during carotid thrombendarterectomy. Anaesthesia 52:116-120,
1997. |
| 10. |
Cho H, Nemoto EM, Yonas
H, Balzer J: Cerebral Monitoring By Oximetry And Somatosensory
Evoked Potentials (SSEP) During Carotid Endarterectomy. J Neurosurg,
89:533-38, 1998. |
| 11. |
Roberts KW, Crnkowic
AP, Linneman LJ: Near infrared spectroscopy detects critical
cerebral hypoxia during carotid endarterectomy in awake patients.
Anesthesiology 1998;89(3A):A934. |
| 12. |
Samra S, Dy E,
Welch K, Dorje P, Zelenock G, Stanley J: Evaluation of a cerebral
oximeter as a monitor of cerebral ischemia during carotid endarterectomy.
Anesthesiology 2000;93:964-70. |
| 13. |
Lee E, Melnyk D,
Kuskowski M, Santilli S: Correlation of cerebral oximetry measurement
with carotid artery stump pressures during carotid endarterectomy.
Vasc Surg 2000;34:403-409. |
| 14. |
Edmonds HL, Sehic
A, Pollock SB, Ganzel BL: Low Cerebrovenous Oxygen Saturation
Predicts Disorientation. Anesthesiology 89(3A): A941, 1998. |
| 15. |
Schmahl TM: Operative
changes effecting incidence of perioperative stroke (IPS) using
cerebral oximetry (CO) and aortic ultrasonography (AU). Anesthesiology
2000; 92:A-399. |
| 16. |
Yao FSF, Levin
SK, Wu D, Illner P, Yu J, Huang SW, Tseng CC: Maintaining cerebral
oxygen saturation during cardiac surgery shortened ICU and hospital
stays. Anesth Analg 2001;92:SCA 86. |
| 17. |
Alexander JC, Kronenfeld
MA, Dance GR: Reduced postoperative length of stay may result
from using cerebral oximetry monitoring to guide treatment.
Ann Thor Surg (in press). |
| 18. |
Nemoto E, Yonas
H, Kassam A: Clinical experience with cerebral oximetry in stroke
and cardiac arrest. Crit Care Med 2000;28:1052-54. |
| 19. |
Maeda H, Fukita
K, Oritani S, Ishida K, Zhu B-L: Evaluation of post-mortem oximetry
with reference to the causes of death. Foren Sci Int 1997;87:201-10. |
| 20. |
McKinsey JF, Davidovitch
R, Gewertz BL: Intraoperative monitoring for cerebral ischemia
during carotid endarterectomy. Problems in Anesthesia 1999;11:193-206. |
| 21. |
Sehic A, Thomas M: Cerebral
oximetry during carotid endarterectomy: Signal failure resulting
from large frontal sinus defect. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth
2000; 14:444-46. |
© 2001-2006 Somanetics Corporation, Troy Michigan
Legal Disclaimer
|